.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
Tech Bankruptcy
April 25, 2007
  Cable TV not a "Utility" for purposes of section 366
I've always wondered whether Internet service could constitute a "utility" for purposes of section 366. If it did, section 366 would protect the debtor with past-due bills from having his or her service cut off.

The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in In re Darby, 470 F.3d 573 (5th Cir. 2006), shed a little light on the issue. However, the Darby case dealt with cable TV access, not Internet service. The Court held that cable TV is a convenience, not a necessity, and thus differs from the traditional utilities specifically identified in section 366. Thus, section 366 did not provide the debtor any protection when Time Warner terminated his service.

The decision did provide some guidance. The Court noted that the debtor had options to his cable TV. For example, he could get satellite television. Although Internet service is a necessity (at least in my opinion), one can obtain Internet access through many different providers. In this respect it is more like television than like electric service or telephone service (athough these days anyone with an Internet connection can get phone service without going through the phone company - is phone service no longer a "utility"?)

Is an Internet connection a convenience or a necessity? We still don't know, but at least we know what television is.

Labels: ,

April 10, 2007
  A Minority Decision from a Major Court
Judge Gerber, sitting in the Southern District of New York, followed the Footstar decision in adopting the "actual" test with respect to assumption of a franchise agreement. In In re Adelphia Communications Corp., 2007 WL 64128 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007), the Court needed to address the debtor's ability to assume and assign a franchise agreement. While the Court spent a significant amount of time analyzing the debtor's right to assign the contract, it easily and quickly dispensed with the question of assumption.

Labels: , , ,

A blog discussing the impact of technology on bankruptcy law and practice.

rss Subscribe to Posts

My Photo
Location: Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Warren E. Agin is a partner in Swiggart & Agin, LLC, a boutique law firm in Boston, Massachusetts focusing on the needs of technology companies. Mr. Agin heads its bankruptcy department. The author of the book Bankruptcy and Secured Lending in Cyberspace (3rd Ed. West 2005), Mr. Agin also chaired the ABA's E-commerce and Insolvency Subcommittee from 1999 to 2005, co-chaired the Boston Bar Association's Internet and Computer Law Committee (2003-2005), and served on the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Technology and Information Services (2008-2011). Mr. Agin currently co-chairs the Editorial Board of Business Law Today. A contributing editor to Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, 3d, and co-author of its chapter on intellectual property for the past fifteen years, he is author of numerous legal articles and addresses on topics of technology, internet and bankruptcy law.

Cable TV not a "Utility" for purposes of section 366
A Minority Decision from a Major Court
August 2004 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / August 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / November 2013 / December 2013 / January 2014 / February 2014 / March 2014 / April 2014 / May 2014 / June 2014 / November 2014 /

Powered by Blogger